A simple game with numbers that nobody has managed to fully explain — played out, with every move justified.
collatz.py · output · proof · check · try it in the playground
Pick a whole number. If it is even, halve it. If it is odd, triple it and add one. Repeat.
Start at 6: 6 → 3 → 10 → 5 → 16 → 8 → 4 → 2 → 1.
The Collatz conjecture says you always reach 1, whatever you start with. Nobody has proved it. But for the numbers 1 to 20 we can simply check.
What path does each start from 1 to 20 take — and can the computer show every move?
fact(trajectory(1, [1]))
implied_by(trajectory(N, [N, *Rest]), (N > 1) & eq(0, N % 2) & is_(Next, N // 2) & trajectory(Next, Rest))
implied_by(
trajectory(N, [N, *Rest]),
(N > 1)
& eq(1, N % 2)
& is_(Next, 3 * N + 1)
& trajectory(Next, Rest),
)
implied_by(in_range(Low, High, Low), Low <= High)
implied_by(in_range(Low, High, N), (Low < High) & is_(Next, Low + 1) & in_range(Next, High, N))
query(in_range(1, 20, N), trajectory(N, Values))
A trajectory is the list of numbers visited. At 1 it is just [1].
Otherwise: if N leaves remainder 0 when divided by 2 (%), halve it
(//); if remainder 1, take 3N+1. in_range counts from 1 to 20.
One answer per starting number, 20 in all. A few:
in_range(1, 20, 3) & trajectory(3, [3, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1])
in_range(1, 20, 6) & trajectory(6, [6, 3, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1])
in_range(1, 20, 16) & trajectory(16, [16, 8, 4, 2, 1])
in_range(1, 20, 18) & trajectory(18, [18, 9, 28, 14, 7, 22, 11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1])
The & just means “both of these hold”. All 20 starts reach 1. Powers of
two like 16 drop straight down; 18 and 19 wander longest, through 21
numbers each.
The path from 3 is a chain of small, checkable moves:
[1] — a fact we gave (fact 1).Paths share their tails, so the proof of 6 reuses the whole proof of 3.
A separate checker read the proof’s 417 steps against the program:
Verdict: checked. Nothing taken on trust.
python -m peye examples/collatz.py # the 20 paths
python -m peye --proof examples/collatz.py # answers with their proof
Or open it in the playground.
Change in_range(1, 20, N) to in_range(27, 27, N) and run again: the start
27 takes a famous detour of 112 numbers, climbing as high as 9232 before it
comes down to 1.
A proof here does not settle the conjecture — nothing about 21 or beyond is claimed. What it does give you is honesty about exactly what was shown: twenty paths, every move recorded and every sum recomputed.